Redacted spent a great deal of time today ( https://rumble.com/v2k74b8-ukraine-launches-massive-attack-in-donbass-us... If you get the whole program it's pretty much what I want ) talking all anti war. It seems that Ukraine has started their "spring offensive" - by shelling civilians. It's become pretty obvious that the plan is to provoke Russia to do something that can be spun into a justification for WW3. As part of this absurd sounding story Natali Morris compares the firing of Tucker Carlson to the firing of Phil Donahue. This may sound odd, but at least superficially it sounds right - Tucker is anti war and the most popular voice on his network. He could be bad for business - if your business is death.
Notice also who provides the targeting data for this shelling.
Another thing that looks like a fever dream: the WHO treaty. It says (and this is NOT a conspiracy theory) that if the WHO declares a pandemic the government automatically cedes absolute power to the WHO. Joe Biden says he will sign the treaty. (if he remembers) Also not a conspiracy theory: 3/4 of the funding for the WHO is from Bill Gates.
Disclaimer: I was vaccinated in March 2021. In June I started spontaneously bleeding and couldn't stop it. The hospital couldn't find out why, but they did find three pancreatic cysts. They are benign (for now?) but if malignant I would not be writing this.
Another story from Breaking Points ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6hqsu0WoR0 ) The Biden administration is running with a policy to promote lower fees for home buyers with low credit scores. This sounds peachy, but it's really insidious. It would pay for the lower fees for the low score people by raising fees for those with higher scores (disclaimer. When I bought my condo my credit score was supposedly 800) But there's a problem, Saagar gave an example where a high score buyer would pay an extra $14k over the life of a mortgage, presumably saving a low score buyer (who would I think see about half that much) But then, would a relatively poor buyer be able to avoid default just because they saved $7k? Probably not, but the extra $14k is more like;y to force the richer buyer into default. The winner: whoever gets to buy up reposessed real estate. Where's General Akbar when we need him?
And that's just one day's worth!