The War on the Homeless

The Supreme Court is currently hearing a case which would allow cities to officially criminalize poverty.

A majority of Supreme Court justices on Monday appeared sympathetic to an Oregon city making it a crime for anyone without a permanent residence to sleep outside in an effort to crack down on homeless encampments across public properties.
The case, City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, carries enormous stakes nationwide as communities confront a growing tide of unhoused residents and increasingly turn to punitive measures to try to incentivize people to take advantage of social services and other shelter options.

This rationalization is a joke. Grants Pass doesn't have a public shelter.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said in a decision last year that a homeless camping ban amounts to "cruel and unusual punishment" under the 8th Amendment. But several members of the high court's conservative majority took a critical view of that conclusion.

"Have we ever applied the Eighth Amendment to civil penalties?" asked a skeptical Justice Clarence Thomas.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett worried about where to draw the line, wondering aloud whether the Eighth Amendment could reasonably be invoked to prohibit punishment for hungry people who steal food or engage in other behaviors necessary for survival.

I wonder if Justice Barrett has ever been hungry, or read Le Miserables? Maybe she had read it and missed the point.
Instead of ticketing and arresting people who had no money, for the crime of not having money, we have actual solutions to homelessness. One good example is currently being done by the VA.

Despite more than two decades of working in homelessness, the sight of anyone—veteran or not—lying on the street or curled on a park bench comes as a shock. Yet it is part of what drives him and others in his organization to work toward ending veteran homelessness—“keeping,” Johnson says, “the two words ‘veteran and ‘homeless’ out of our mouths.”
The efforts have paid off. Over a 12-year stretch that ended in 2022, the population of unhoused veterans dropped by more than half. Although that trend reversed over the last year—rising 7.4% from 2022 to 2023—it was still lower than the 12% overall increase in homelessness.

Part of the long-term success of reducing the number of unhoused veterans is the Veterans Affairs’ pledge to end it—as well as the funding to cover the costs of that goal.

Coordinated efforts between local, state, and federal agencies that can act as safety nets; screening protocols to identify veterans at risk for homelessness; billions of dollars in federal money; and the prioritization of veteran homelessness by lawmakers across political parties has also contributed to that success. To date, 83 communities and the entire states of Connecticut, Delaware, and Virginia have effectively ended homelessness among veterans.

But that level of progress hasn’t been replicated in the homeless population at large. This year’s increase in overall homelessness signifies the largest jump since the federal government began counting in 2007.

Coordinated efforts and billions of dollars. In other words, it became a priority after officials were shamed into acting.
We CAN do this, but classism and victim blaming keeps us from acting. The reality is that half of the homeless have jobs. There is also another method to address homelessness - direct action.

“We want affordable, permanent housing for human beings,” Sprowal was known to say, “so they have some control over their life.”

In Philadelphia, the gambit worked.

The ’88 housing takeover enraged nearby residents, who demanded immediate remedy from both City Hall and the federal government. Officials quickly vowed to break up the occupation, but police never stormed in.

Two days later, the group left peacefully, with a promise from the city to negotiate a deal with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Similar takeovers followed, and within weeks, Sprowal’s group helped secure hundreds of units of publicly owned housing to be transferred to the unhoused in the late ’80s.

Share
up
9 users have voted.

Comments

-
for the private prison industry.

up
8 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@QMS

That’s my thinking too. Fining people or putting them in jail because they can’t afford rent is so draconian and cruel. Of course if states have money to jail people then they definitely have money to house them.

I saw a headline saying that California has spent over a hundred million on homelessness with nothing to show for it. Every state in the country has been throwing money at the problem, but it keeps getting worse every year. So whose pockets is the money going into? Reminds me of the Clinton foundation that pays its people more than it puts to charitable causes. It’s fcking money laundering!

up
8 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

@snoopydawg "public commons", areas we all have access to, as we sort of own it, as citizens and taxpayers. All other real estate is 100% privately owned.
It is illegal to trespass on my property. I control who "squats" on it.
In theory, every homeless person in a commons has as much right to be there as you do.
We have eroded the bar against debtor's prison for decades.
This Supreme Court decision will be far reaching, define use and enjoyment of property, as well as punishment for being poor.

up
6 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

@on the cusp Prisoners in China help produce our cheap goods, so why not here? They'll get paid $.17/hr, and that can go towards their room and board. Solves the labor shortage, no minimum wage or safety concerns. See, easy peasey.

up
3 users have voted.

@Snode here. Rate of pay depends on whether it is state, federal or private prisons.

up
4 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

TheOtherMaven's picture

@Snode

Look up "prison labor".

up
2 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

@TheOtherMaven while Attorney General, blocked paroles and early prison releases because those prisoners were a valuable work force for corporations.
She is a sweet heart.

up
3 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

usefewersyllables's picture

of our population apparently has it all figured out.

In the following Zerohedge article, the comments are running about 100:1 towards "it should be legal to shoot them on sight". In the case of the article, the victim (which I choose to define as "the one who got dead") was an illegal immigrant. Well, hell- it's a short putt from killing illegals to killing the homeless. Once you decide that one flavor of humanoid biped is nonhuman and therefore fair game, why stop there?

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/let-me-go-home-okay-mistrial-declare...

The comments give me a pretty good idea about where a significant, nonzero number of people seem to think things should go. It'd save the gummint a lot of money (and investigation time and manpower) to just let the vigilantes take their course, amirite?

Not a fan.

up
6 users have voted.

Twice bitten, permanently shy.

failure on the part of corrupt authorities to service the requirement for affordable housing.
referencing any other excuse or divisive hypocrisy in discussing it is doing the devil's laundry.

up
3 users have voted.