Hillary Clinton

Wikileaks Releases "Rosetta Stone" Of Clinton Foundation Corruption Story

Submitted by bobswern on Thu, 10/27/2016 - 1:50am

As many will note upon reading the ledes in Thursday's Wall Street Journal and New York Times, and elsewhere throughout Thursday's media cycle about the latest Wikileaks' email dump--specifically: a 2011 memo from President Clinton's right-hand-man-turned-"public-relations"-mogul Doug Band--it is now crystal clear that it was, indeed, as many have speculated for the last couple of years, Band who provided much of the ethically bereft (outright forbidden--by none o

Take the money!!

Submitted by GreyWolf on Sun, 10/16/2016 - 2:00pm

Take the money!! -- that's the bottom line, that's always the bottom line: just take the damn money. You know it, I know it, and they know it. They're gonna' take the money, so why hesitate?

There's yet another John Podesta email out on Wikileaks that is causing a (very small) bit of a stir over at Reddit. The email talks about taking money from "persons acting as agents of foreign principals in a political or quasi-political capacity" who are registered as such under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). (Is there anything fishy about foreign governments funding a US Presidential campaign? Of course there is, cut out the carp!)

Why I'm Voting For Jill Stein

Submitted by movie buff on Mon, 10/03/2016 - 6:41pm

An essay was published here a few days ago titled "Why I am Voting For Hillary." While I respect the author for posting it here--"behind enemy lines," so to speak--I still felt that his reasoning was just the latest update of the same reasoning we hear every four years, which goes: You have to vote for the Democratic nominee because the Republicans are awful.

I concur: they are awful. And they'll likely always be awful. Yet some people are always trying to use this inescapable part of American political reality to justify all manner of backsliding by the other political party--you know, the one that claims to represent "the people."

So I would like to write a rebuttal here. Not of that article, but of that entire manner of thinking.

Pages